Tim Handel vs Maximilian Neuchrist Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 May at 11:03 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Handel vs M. Neuchrist

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Handel 1 - 0 Neuchrist
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tim Handel winning 2 and Maximilian Neuchrist winning 0. The last match between Tim Handel and Maximilian Neuchrist was at the M15 Warmbad Villach, 29-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Tim Handel getting the victory 7-5 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Handel | 1 |
| Neuchrist | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Warmbad Villach(05-29-25)
T. Handel vs M. Neuchrist H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $5,955 |
| 57.69% (210-154) | Career Total W/L | 60.05% (487-324) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Handel vs M. Neuchrist Match Preview:
- How does Handel's second serve compare to Neuchrist's in recent form? Handel has won 39.17% of second serve points, whereas Neuchrist has achieved 50.08%.
- Considering return game stats, Handel excels by winning 47.88% of opponents' second serve points and 28.66% on first serve, outperforming Neuchrist's 42.61% and 24.69% respectively.
- How do both players handle pressure situations like breakpoints? Neuchrist edges out Handel, saving 57.69% of breakpoints while Handel saves 51.69%.
- In terms of match wins over the past year, Neuchrist has a stronger record with a 68.09% win rate compared to Handel's 51.61%.
- Which surfaces favor their play styles? Handel has a preference for clay with a 63% win rate, whereas Neuchrist performs best on hard courts at 64%.
- Looking at the level of competition, Neuchrist has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 293.77 against Handel's 367.18.
- In deciding set situations, Neuchrist has greater success, winning 70% compared to Handel's 53%.
- Interestingly, Handel has a better breakpoint conversion in recent form at 35.4%, with Neuchrist trailing at 29.03%.
Editorial Prediction (May 29, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming tennis match, it becomes clear that both players have their distinctive strengths. Neuchrist's superior second serve performance, coupled with a higher breakpoint save percentage, suggests formidable resilience under pressure.
Conversely, Handel demonstrates strong return game capabilities, winning more points on opponents’ serves. Additionally, his proficiency on clay might be beneficial if the upcoming match is on this surface.
While Neuchrist faces tougher competition regularly and excels in crucial deciding sets, Handel can capitalize on converting breakpoints more efficiently.
Collectively, these considerations highlight Neuchrist's overall experience and resilience as factors that make him the likely favorite to win this tennis match.
Tim Handel vs Maximilian Neuchrist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Handel vs M. Neuchrist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:17:53 | Average Match Time | 2:17:53 |
| 62% (62/100) | 1st Serve % | 73% (51/70) |
| 73% (45/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (33/51) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 18% (2/11) |
| 40% (28/70) | Return Points Win % | 38% (38/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Handel Recent Matches Played
M. Neuchrist Recent Matches Played

T. Handel vs M. Neuchrist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.69% (210/154) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.05% (487/324) |
| 57.04% (474/357) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.39% (1072/764) |
| 52.53% (4191/3787) | Games Win/Loss | 53.26% (9513/8348) |
| 56.45% (35/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.32% (238/132) |
| 61.35% (154/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.34% (164/122) |
| 41.18% (21/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.19% (85/69) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 962 | Aces Total | 2898 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 896 | Total Double Faults | 1076 |
| 1:27:49 | Average Match Time | 1:10:50 |
| 427.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 575.05 |
| 63% (13229/21096) | 1st Serve % | 66% (25972/39595) |
| 69% (9076/13229) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (18528/25972) |
| 48% (3815/7867) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (7097/13623) |
| 42% (914/2166) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1403/3427) |
| 40% (8585/21317) | Return Points Win % | 37% (14757/39510) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 31.25% (5/11) |
| 36.67% (11/19) | Challenger W/L | 52.60% (152/137) |
| 59.58% (199/135) | Futures W/L | 65.74% (330/172) |
| 57% (206/359) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (481/793) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 56% (59/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (172/317) |
| 46% (50/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (125/227) |
| 87% (213/186) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (462/408) |
| 13% (213/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (462/54) |
| 16% (151/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (348/77) |